References from:
Stoner, M. (2007). PowerPoint in a new key. Communication Education, 56, 354-382.
I’ve only kept the specific cites related to PowerPoint or presentational media

Atkinson, C. (2004). PowerPoint usability: Q&A with Don Norman. Retrieved April 3,
2006, fromhttp:www.sociablemedia.com/articles_norman.htm

Bartsch, R. A., & Cobern, K. M. (2003). Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in
lectures.
Computers & Education , 41, 77-86.

Byrne, D. (2003). Learning to love PowerPoint.
Wired magazine , 11, 112-117.
Carrell, L. J., & Menzel, K. E. (2001). Variations in learning, motivation, and perceived
immediacy between live and distance education classrooms.
Communication
Education, 50, 230-240.

Cramer, K. M., Collins, K. R., Snider, D., & Fawcett, G. (2007). The virtual lecture hall:
Utilisation, effectiveness and student perceptions.
British Journal of Educational
Technology, 38, 106-115.

Downing, J., & Garmon, C. (2001). Teaching students in the basic course how to use
presentation software.
Communication Education, 50, 218-229.

Gunel, M., Hand, B., & Gunduz, S. (2006). Comparing student understanding of quantum
physics when embedding multimodal representations into two different writing
formats: Presentation format versus summary report format.
Science Education,
90, 1092-1112.

Keefe, D. D., & Willett, J. D. (2004). A case for PowerPoint as a faculty authoring
system.
Cell Biology Education, 3, 156-158.

Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001).
Multimodal teaching and
learning. London: Continuum.

Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001).
Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of
Contemporary communication. London: Arnold.

Kunkel, K. R. (2004). A research note assessing the benefit of presentation software in
two different lecture courses.
Teaching Sociology, 32, 188-196.

Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing.
Journal of
Communication, 50, 46-70.

Lanius, C. (2004). PowerPoint, not your grandmother’s presentations, but is it evil? Cell

Biology Education, 3, 158-160.

Levasseur, D. G., Dean, K. W., & Pfaff, J. (2004). Speech pedagogy beyond the basics: A
study of instructional methods in the advanced public speaking course.

Communication Education, 53, 234-252.

Levasseur, D. G., & Sawyer, J. K. (2006). Pedagogy meets PowerPoint: A research
review of the effects of computer-generated slides in the classroom.
The Review
of Communication, 6, 101-123.

Mantei, E. (2000). Using internet class notes and PowerPoint in the physical geology
lecture.
Journal of College Science Teaching , 29, 301_305.

Mason, R., & Hlynka, D. (1998). PowerPoint’ in the classroom: Where’s the power?

Educational Technology, 38, 42-45.

McDonald, K. (2004). Examining PowerPointlessness.
Cell Biology Education , 3, 160-
161.

O’Neil, J. (2005/2006). The relational aesthetics of PowerPoint: Affective/Not effective
communication.
The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and
Society, 1, 85-91.

Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (1994). A dual coding view of imagery and verbal processes in
reading comprehension. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.),

Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed.) (pp. 582-601). Newark, DE:
International Reading Association.

Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending
human intelligence with intelligent technologies.
Educational researcher, 20, 2-9.

Susskind, J. E. (2005). PowerPoint’s power in the classroom: Enhancing students’ self-
efficacy and attitudes.
Computers & Education , 45, 203-215.

Tufte, E. (2003a). PowerPoint is evil.
Wired magazine , 11, 118-119.

Tufte, E. R (2003b).
The cognitive style of PowerPoint: Pitching out corrupts within.
Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.

Voss, D. (2004). PowerPoint in the classroom, is it really necessary?
Cell Biology
Education , 3,// 155-156.